QoE for Lenders & SBA Lending — Stronger Underwriting | Shepi

    QoE for Lenders & SBA Lending

    Published February 2026

    $5K QoE vs. $200K–$2M default exposure — the math is simple.

    $5K–$25K

    QoE cost depending on complexity

    $200K–$2M+

    Default cost on a single bad loan

    Hours

    For preliminary analysis

    The cost of a bad acquisition loan far exceeds the cost of a Quality of Earnings report. For lenders — especially those underwriting SBA 7(a) acquisition loans — QoE analysis has shifted from "nice to have" to a critical underwriting requirement.

    Why Lenders Require QoE

    Acquisition lending carries unique risks. Unlike traditional business loans where the borrower has an operating track record, acquisition loans fund a change of ownership — and the new owner's ability to service debt depends entirely on the accuracy of the target's financial picture.

    Earnings verification

    Confirms that reported EBITDA reflects actual, sustainable cash flow

    Adjustment transparency

    Identifies owner add-backs, one-time items, and discretionary expenses with documentation

    Trend analysis

    Reveals whether the business is growing, stable, or declining — critical for debt service projections

    Working capital assessment

    Ensures adequate working capital for ongoing operations post-acquisition

    SBA Lending & QoE Requirements

    SBA lenders face heightened scrutiny from the SBA and their CDCs. While the SBA SOP doesn't explicitly mandate QoE reports, prudent lenders increasingly require them for acquisition loans above $500K — and many require them for all change-of-ownership transactions.

    The rationale is straightforward: SBA acquisition loans often involve borrowers with limited equity (as low as 10% injection) and long amortization periods. If reported earnings are overstated by even 15–20%, the debt service coverage ratio drops below acceptable thresholds. A QoE report catches these discrepancies before the loan closes.

    Strengthening Your Underwriting

    Adjusted EBITDA bridge

    Clear reconciliation from reported to adjusted earnings, with each adjustment categorized and documented

    Revenue quality metrics

    Customer concentration, contract vs. project revenue, recurring revenue percentage

    Expense normalization

    Owner compensation benchmarking, related-party transaction analysis, discretionary vs. necessary spending

    Cash flow validation

    Proof of cash analysis reconciling reported income to bank deposits

    Working capital peg

    Normalized working capital target for the purchase agreement

    Lender Workflow with Shepi

    1

    Pre-screening

    Run a quick financial assessment on the borrower's application package to evaluate deal viability before committing underwriting resources

    2

    QoE coordination

    If you require a third-party QoE, recommend QoE providers who use Shepi for faster turnaround

    3

    Underwriting integration

    Incorporate QoE findings into your credit analysis and debt service coverage calculations

    4

    Committee presentation

    Use QoE-derived adjusted financials in your credit memo and loan committee materials

    5

    Portfolio monitoring

    For ongoing covenant compliance, the same analytical framework supports periodic financial reviews

    Risk Mitigation

    Every acquisition loan that defaults costs the institution far more than the QoE analysis would have. The math is simple:

    QoE cost

    Typically $5K–$25K depending on complexity

    Default cost

    Loss exposure of $200K–$2M+ on a single bad loan, plus workout costs and reputation risk

    Prevention value

    Catches earnings overstatements, undisclosed liabilities, and unsustainable trends that cause most acquisition loan failures

    FAQ

    Related Resources

    Ready to Accelerate Your QoE Analysis?

    From raw financials to lender-ready conclusions in hours, not weeks.